The Tenth Circuit announced today that it will bypass normal procedure and post audio online from the historic argument on Utah's same-sex marriage ban, to be held April 10 in Denver. Presumably, the same will be allowed for the April 17 argument on the Oklahoma ban.
As noted in my recent letter to Chief Judge Briscoe requesting that change, persons wanting to hear argument audio must, under court rules, file a motion (stating reasons).
Thank you to Chief Judge Briscoe and the entire Tenth Circuit for opening the proceedings to all interested persons, including the public, as well as national and international press.
My guess is that the Tenth Circuit cases have the best shot of getting Supreme Court review because they present the clearest "case or controversy." Unlike other states, Utah and Oklahoma are defending their laws with no mixed messages from high state officials.
Showing posts with label Mary Beck Briscoe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mary Beck Briscoe. Show all posts
Monday, March 10, 2014
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Tenth Circuit Same-Sex Marriage Arguments: Letter Requesting Online Audio
This letter was sent to Chief Judge Mary Beck Briscoe of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
February 22, 2014
Dear Chief Judge Briscoe:
This letter is a request for the Tenth Circuit to consider posting argument audio online, as a routine matter, and for the same-sex marriage arguments in April, specifically. My interest is as a lawyer, freelance journalist, and citizen.
The U.S. Supreme Court and ten federal appellate circuits post argument audio to their websites. Only three circuits, including the Tenth Circuit, do not. The Tenth Circuit is the only one of the three that requires a motion to be filed to obtain audio.
The April arguments about the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans will be part of American legal history, as the country and the courts weigh this important issue. There will be national and even international interest in the arguments. The Tenth Circuit courtroom cannot accommodate that level of interest, nor can any courtroom. Since the proceedings are public, this presents a meaningful gap in public access.
Posting audio of the arguments online would help fill this gap. It would also reduce the administrative burden on Tenth Circuit judges, staff, and persons requesting audio, as motions would not need to be filed or processed.
The Supreme Court, famously cautious on access, has been posting its audio to the Internet since 2010. The Ninth Circuit recently began live streaming audio of all arguments and video of en banc arguments.
It would be greatly appreciated if the Tenth Circuit would review its current policy and join the Supreme Court and most of its sister circuits in offering access to argument audio online, particularly for the April marriage arguments.
Thank you for your consideration.
This letter is a request for the Tenth Circuit to consider posting argument audio online, as a routine matter, and for the same-sex marriage arguments in April, specifically. My interest is as a lawyer, freelance journalist, and citizen.
The U.S. Supreme Court and ten federal appellate circuits post argument audio to their websites. Only three circuits, including the Tenth Circuit, do not. The Tenth Circuit is the only one of the three that requires a motion to be filed to obtain audio.
The April arguments about the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans will be part of American legal history, as the country and the courts weigh this important issue. There will be national and even international interest in the arguments. The Tenth Circuit courtroom cannot accommodate that level of interest, nor can any courtroom. Since the proceedings are public, this presents a meaningful gap in public access.
Posting audio of the arguments online would help fill this gap. It would also reduce the administrative burden on Tenth Circuit judges, staff, and persons requesting audio, as motions would not need to be filed or processed.
The Supreme Court, famously cautious on access, has been posting its audio to the Internet since 2010. The Ninth Circuit recently began live streaming audio of all arguments and video of en banc arguments.
It would be greatly appreciated if the Tenth Circuit would review its current policy and join the Supreme Court and most of its sister circuits in offering access to argument audio online, particularly for the April marriage arguments.
Thank you for your consideration.
Friday, May 28, 2010
Judges Series: Chief Judge Mary Beck Briscoe
On May 1, 2010, Mary Beck Briscoe became the Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, in anticipation of the impending retirement of former Chief Judge Robert H. Henry. Per the Tenth Circuit website (Court News and Events), Chief Judge Briscoe, whose chambers are in Lawrence, Kansas, "has served on the court since 1995, and served on the Kansas Court of Appeals for the eleven preceding years, the last five as chief judge." Her complete Tenth Circuit bio is here. Other items of note:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)